Hardball Dynasty - NTC
Wednesday, May 9, 2012
Please vote on the proposed rule change!
If approved, first-year owners to No Trade Clause will not be required to meet a minimum win requirement in their first full season of No Trade Clause. In their second season, the full minimum win requirement will go into effect, including the 2-season requirement, which is a sum of their first full season and their second full season of No Trade Clause.
A "first-year owner" will be defined as an owner who did not complete a full season in No Trade Clause the previous season.
If approved, it will go into effect beginning with owners new to No Trade Clause in season 6.
Monday, January 16, 2012
ROY Favorites
Anyway, here's a look at a few of the ROY favorites.
|
After struggling to even make the 40-man roster with the Yankees, Vanguri was snatched up by the Tiger Blood in the Rule 5 draft and has made an immediate impact at the Major League level. The free-swinging righty has jacked 28 HR in 319 AB, posting an OPS of .968. He may struggle to stay at 100% for an entire Major League season, but when he's in the lineup, he's been producing. The questions about his ability to produce at the highest level have been answered. The only questions that remain are: 1) With a name like Jacob, can we be sure he is really from Japan? and 2) Is he the only Japanese man with sideburns?
|
Harry "Patch-stache" Wilson has become one of the more well-rounded players in the league this year. He's a lock for a 20-20 season, and will flirt with 30-30. He's been a run-producing machine in his rookie season, and doesn't show any signs of slowing. He completely by-passed AAA on his way to the Majors, so his success should come as no surprise. His defense, while good, still has some room to grow, so Wilson's contributions will only continue to grow...just like his 'stache.
|
Nicholas Walters is...ummm, sorry, Mr. Walters has been posting...uhhhhh, Nick...what the (bleep) are you thinking with those glasses? Seriously, it looks like you took a crow bar, colored it red, and wrapped it around your face! What's that? This is supposed to be about your contributions as a baseball player in your first Major League season? Alright...but you're gonna have to take those ridiculous things off, at least for the next few minutes. Like I was saying, Nicholas Walters has done what some said was impossible, and that's improve his production after taking the leap to the Majors. He's posted career bests in OAV, OBP, and ERA (and all previous seasons were in AAA). He's using finesse pitches and relying on a good defense to take care of opposing hitters. But it's hard to argue with success. He's 10-4 in 18 starts, and even has 80 Ks through 115 innings. Keep it up Walters! But, dude...use some of that pay raise to buy some new specs.
|
Al Gonzales, out of the Dominican Republic, may have gotten a fat pay check during season 1, but he hasn't let that make him lazy. He's put in the work, and has succeeded at every level. He, too, skipped AAA completely, and is tearing it up for Anaheim. Posting a 1.08 WHIP, .193 OAV, and nearly 1 K/Inning, Gonzales has been showing why he's worth the $20MM signing bonus. And the scariest part is, he's only getting better. He does throw the occasional dud, but always comes back to remind us he belongs among the best.
So who get's your pick for ROY? One of these? Someone else? Still don't know? Luckily we've got the second half to work all that out.
Thursday, October 20, 2011
Players to (Continue to) Watch - Finally!
So without further ado (did I really just write that???), he we go!
|
Anaheim has invested over $20MM in this youngster, and hopes for big things in the next few years. Relying mostly on breaking balls, Gonzalez sets hitters up with a 92 mph slider, and finishes them off with a nasty change up. He is striking out over 10 batters per 9 innings this season, and could see the Majors as soon as next season (as a September call-up if nothing else).
Season 3: 11-3, 150 2/3 innings, 169 K, 3.11 ERA, 1.24 WHIP
----------------------
|
Arizona's player to watch is not stranger to success. As a member of the AL All-Star team at just 23 years old last year, he's drawing comparisons to another prominent 1B, Albert Pujols. His core numbers have improved each of the last 3 seasons, and is currently on pace to hit 64 HR this year. Whitey is currently sidelined with a stiff hamstring, but expects to be back in a week. Hopefully he can talk some of the big free agent pitchers into signing with Arizona so they can turn those gaudy stats into wins.
Season 3: 72 R, 40 HR, 92 RBI, .300/.371/.667
----------------------
|
The top pick for Chicago in Season 1 shot through the minors like a bottle rocket. Starting in rookie ball upon being drafted, he got the call that he was being promoted. He said good morning to Low-A, good afternoon to High-A, and good night to AA as he headed straight from rookie ball to AAA. He spent 1/2 the season in AAA, hitting .344 with 19 HR in 227 AB, and at the age of 21, Chicago couldn't keep him down any longer. He finished his rookie season with 23 HR in 254 AB, and has only gotten better. He's leading the way for the Pale Hose as they run away with the AL North. Now Poole has his sites set on winning a WS ring, just a year after enjoying his first beer.
Season 3: 65 R, 35 HR, 96 RBI, .283/.358/.618
----------------------
|
With a name like Sterling Steele, would you expect any less? Steele boasts a repertoire of 4 strong pitches, but uses his 4-seamer to blow hitters away. Like Poole, Sterling Steele spent little time in the minors. After completely by-passing AAA, he posted good major league numbers last season. The post-season jitters got him, though, and with Durham hoping to make their way back to the playoffs, Steele is looking to show that he can be the same pitcher in the post-season that he can in the regular season.
Season 3: 8-8, 127 2/3 innings, 96 K, 3.81 ERA, 1.26 WHIP
----------------------
|
Manuel Lima has the privilege of being the first player drafted in NTC history, and he's certainly living up to the burden placed on him . He's been perfect in save situations this year, converting 19 of 19. There's nothing fancy about Lima's approach to hitters, either. It's a huge helping of his 100 mph fastball (with movement), complimented by the occasional slider. Pitching in a winnable division, he hopes to show off his prowess to the world on the biggest stage in the playoffs.
Season 3: 19 Saves, 33 1/3 innings, 30 K, 1.89 ERA, 1.14 WHIP
----------------------
|
William Brand began his career with guns-a-blazing, winning the ROY award in Season 1. After falling victim to the Sophomore Slump last season, he's righted the ship and is putting together a great season. He's been able to neutralize hitters with a nasty sinker, which he's been able to keep down in the zone this year. The Yankees are in a tight battle with the Outliers, so look for Brand to play a huge role down the stretch.
Season 3: 11-3, 140 2/3 innings, 108 K, 2.10 ERA, 1.26 WHIP
----------------------
|
Derrin Rowe (no relation to Mike Rowe...you know, Dirty Jobs, Ford commercials...) is looking to prove that he can make it in the bigs. He doesn't throw very hard, so he relies more on the location of his fastball than the speed, but he does have a very good sinker. Pitching in Santa Fe hasn't been his friend, but he's managed 10 wins to 2 losses, which is really what matters in the end. Look for Rowe to keep his team in games, but runs are going to be expected in the launching pad that is WhatIfSports Field.
Season 3: 10-2, 83 1/3 innings, 64 K, 4.21 ERA, 1.42 WHIP
----------------------
|
Though not fully developed, and still a young pup at 21, Beckwith was thrust into the Majors this season and was expected to perform. He's come through, with an ERA in the mid-3s, and on pace to win 17 games. Though there hasn't been much change in the quality of his pitches, he's been improving the command of those pitches. Syracuse is on fast track to the playoffs, and will hope Beckwith has what it takes to get the Siege closer to the WS this year.
Season 3: 11-5, 153 innings, 120 K, 3.65 ERA, 1.27 WHIP
----------------------
|
Is he a starter? Is he a long reliever? Middle relief? Who knows? But with a phenomenal fastball/change up combination, the Acers are finding ways to get him innings. Pfeffer definitely pitches to contact, but as an extreme ground-ball pitcher, he relies on a great defense to back him up (which, to date, has been pretty good). Vic is still on his way up, as he continues to improve, so don't sleep on this guy. He may not log 200 innings, but when he's on the hill, he'll be effective.
Season 3: 3-5, 64 1/3 innings, 55 K, 3.64 ERA, 1.29 WHIP
----------------------
|
Yes, I know, chicks dig the long ball. I've got the t-shirt, too. But Nigel Baker doesn't care. He knows his role, and does it well. For his career, Baker has reached base 38% of the time, and when he gets on, he's off to the races. He stole 50 bases last season, and is on a similar pace this season. Those stolen bases turn those singles into doubles or triples. Does that show up on the stat line? Not directly. Do chicks dig the stolen base? Not in any way. But don't look for that to stop Baker. (And as a piece of advice, Baker. If you want chicks to dig anything about you, lose the mustache. You're 25, for crying out loud!)
Season 3: 70 R, 20 RBI, 37 SB, .279/.360/.310
'Til next time (which hopefully won't be too long...)
Commish
Thursday, August 25, 2011
Congratulations!
|
Advice from the Commish
The first piece of advice I generally give is to ask a lot of questions! You can use the forums if you’d like, but be sure it doesn’t sound like you’re complaining about something in the game, as this will almost always be met with ridicule and insult. Genuine questions, however, are usually answered quickly and accurately, even if it seems like a “silly” question. You can also use sitemail and trade chat (found in the HBD interface) to ask questions. But on to player evaluation.
PITCHERS
For pitchers, control is where I start. If a pitcher has control below 40, it's rare that he'll be successful in the bigs, regardless of his other ratings. You may be able to find a role for him if his other ratings are amazing, but I generally stay away from them. If control is below 60ish, I look for ratings in other areas to back it up. After control I go for vR split. 2/3 of all hitters are right handed, so I want a good vR rating. Between 50 and 60 is about as low as I go. As with control, if it's near the bottom of the acceptable range, they're going to have to have other ratings to back it up. After vR, I look at their pitches. For predictably solid results, I'm looking for one pitch greater than 80, another pitch greater than 65, and a third pitch greater than 50. Note: order of the pitches doesn't matter. This doesn't have to be a hard and fast rule, however. If they have great control (85+) and great splits (80+ vR, 70+ vL), I can live with 3-4 pitches between 65 and 75. What good control and splits can't make up for is pitches of 65, 48, 32, 21. That guy's a career minor leaguer. When evaluating pitchers, don't forget to look at durability. That's how quickly they recover from fatigue. They recover about as many percentage points per cycle as their durability rating. A SP with durability of 10 is going to take 6 cycles to return from only going down to 40% after a start...this drops his value. Also take a quick look at stamina. Stamina is the last pitching rating I look at because it really determines what role he's going to take and plays a role in how many innings he'll be able to pitch, but it doesn't determine how effective he's going to be when he's on the mound. Be careful, however, of a stamina below 10. A guy can have 95+ ratings in every category, but a stamina of 4 means he'll be able to face 1-2 batters per outing. Realistically he's not going to retire EVERY batter he faces, so he'll end up with quite a few appearances with no innings logged. That's just not a very useful player IMO.
HITTERS
For hitters, it gets a little more muddled, because there are more ratings to consider, and there's not one rating that renders a guy completely useless. I start with splits. If they have splits I can work with, say 60+ for vR, 50+ for vL, I then look at contact, power, eye, speed/base running (as a combo). If they have 65+ in 2 or more of these 4, I know I can use him. For instance, if his splits pass the test and he has 85 contact, 20 power, 90 eye, and 60ish speed/br, I know he won't strike out much (from the 85 contact) and he'll get a bunch of walks (90 eye), which will allow him to get a few stolen bases once he's on. If his speed/br is higher, I know he'll get more SB. If it's much lower than 60, I know he's just going to have a great OBP without many SB. I also know that I shouldn't expect many HR (with 20 power). On the flip side, if a guy (assuming the split test) has 20 contact, 90 power, 90 eye, and 20 speed/br, I'm looking at an Adam Dunn type player. 150 strikeouts, 100 walks, and 30-45 HR (depending on the ballpark). You can't win with a team full of either type of player, but a balance of these guys mixed in with guys who have 70+ in every category gets you going on the right track. As with pitchers, durability is important, especially for catchers. Catcher fatigue more quickly than other positions, say 1B or DH. Most catchers have a fatigue in the 60 range, which is why you almost always need 2 of them. I tend to run into one catcher with a great vR split but a terrible vL split, and another one vice versa. So i platoon these guys (one vR pitchers, one vL). This takes advantage of their splits, as well as gives them the rest they'll need.
DEFENSE
As far as defense goes, I generally follow the guidelines you can find by clicking on the position on the 'Edit Rosters' page. I tend to sacrifice hitting for defense on the guys up the middle (SS, 2B, CF). However, if all 3 of them have terrible hitting ratings but great fielding ratings, you're not going to generate a lot of offense...especially if you're in the NL. You'll have those 3 plus your pitcher as almost half of your lineup, and this is a sure-fire rally killer. So if a guy has 90+ in all defensive categories, I can live with abysmal hitting ratings, but I don't want more than 1 of them. Oh, and for catchers, I don't like a pitch calling rating below 50, and I try not to have arm strength and arm accuracy dip below 60.
As a general note, if a guy is near the bottom of what I've called "acceptable" ratings in all categories, he's going to be a 24th or 25th player on the roster, but not much more. If a player has GREAT ratings in certain categories, it can (not necessarily will, but can) make up for deficiencies in other areas. And don't ignore health. A player is only valuable when he's on the field, and poor health can be dangerous...especially because an injury can set a developing player back in his progress, and can make a veteran take a hit in all ratings that he will probably not get back.
Other general notes...
-Pitchers tend to improve longer than hitters will. Hitters generally stop progressing after 4professional seasons (regardless of what their projecting ratings say or how old they are), while pitchers sometimes improve into their 30s.
-Projected ratings are only as good as your advanced scouting budget, so let this determine how much you rely on them. Also, projected ratings become current ratings when a player reaches 27 y/o. Also, look at the progress of their ratings over the seasons. If you see a pitchers control is currently 60 and projects to 85, look at the progress of his control. If it went from 40 his rookie season to 47 in his second, 55 in his third, 58 in his 4th, 59 in his 5th, and 60 in his 6th year, there's good reason to believe he's not going to make it to 85.
-Makeup has an effect on how likely they are to reach their projections, so it makes a nice tie-breaker when looking at 2 players. It will also slow their decline when they get older.
Let me know what you think.
Commish
Thursday, July 21, 2011
Season 2 Draft - Picks 1-11
|
Hailing from Cicero, IN, Cam Blake drove west in his 1984 Toyota Celica towards Kansas City (where the Monarchs, interestingly enough, have all 6 levels of their baseball organization located). Abdullah Woodward, his agent, informed him that he'd be assigned to Hi-A, and should be ready to hit the ground running. With $3,000,000 in hand, Cam Blake looks to make a huge impact in the ML with his defense, power, and impressive speed for a catcher. Look for Blake to jump into the Major Leagues in the next couple years.
Pick 10
|
With the 10th overall pick, Atlanta landed college phenom Lou Rubel out of the College of Saint Rose. Relying more on his control than velocity, Rubel confuses hitters with a combination of sinkers, sliders, and change ups. He's also got an average cut fastball, and is working on developing a curveball. Rubel is ready to pitch in the Majors now, and has little patience for the Braves organization moving him slowly, so his maturity, along with his ability to avoid injury, will play a role in when we get to see his ML debut. But make no mistake...it's "when", not "if".
Pick 9
|
One of the 6 pitchers taken in this year's top 10, Derrick Smalley has surely impressed in rookie ball. Limiting hitters to a .211 average while striking out 63 in 65 innings, Smalley looks to progress through the Milwaukee farm system quickly. He has good velocity on his cut fastball, and does a nice job with a slider/curveball combo to keep batted balls on the ground. If he can stay away from the High Life Beerfall (the famous "waterfall" of beer in center field in Milwaukee), Smalley will be a key piece to ensuring a deep playoff run for the High Life in the future.
Pick 8
Roger Willis
What can we say about Roger Willis? Well, not much really. My scouts got lost on their way to Sun Valley, ID to visit his family. But we know what we see on film, and that's incredible speed, great power, a good understanding of the strike zone, and a decent glove that needs a little work to stay at 2B. Willis has had a little trouble with his propensity to strikeout, but he is sure to find his way to the big show soon enough.
Pick 7
|
Hey, Tito! Scout for Minnesota, Andrew Corey, knew he had to have this guy the first time he saw him pitch...and he hasn't disappointed thus far. In 19 innings in rookie ball, Doerr has yet to allow a run! He's given up 7 hits, walked 3, while striking out 30. Yes, folks, that's a 3/30 BB/K ratio. The only issue with Tito Doerr is that his idols growing up were Rob Dibble and John Rocker. So he sometimes gets a little too fired up when he takes the mound. If you want to see him flip his lid, just say two words..."paint chips." No one is sure why, but it sends him into orbit! But even with some anger management issues, Doerr is a top-notch pitcher who will be closing for the Miracles in just a few short years.
Pick 6
|
Santa Fe made Dave Bryant a Rattler with the 6th overall pick in the Season 2 draft. Bryant was ready to get out of town after attending Assumption HS (and we all about assumptions). During his time of assumption, he dominated his peers. He entered the draft as the 5th best amateur player in the country, and his potential shows us why. He has impressive control for an 18 year old, with a nasty slider and an equally nasty screwball. High schoolers were completely man-handled by him, but professionals are having a little more success. With great makeup, it'll be up to Bryant to work with the coaching staff to turn potential into reality.
Pick 5
|
As the third position player selected in the draft, Gene Clark plans to utilize his excellent glove and above average bat to turn the Yardbirds into contenders. Clark boasts blazing speed to go with his glove, and is working on his command of the strike zone. When Clark makes his major league debut, it will likely be due to his speed and defense, but make no mistake about it...he has the ability to turn into a threat with the bat too. If he can become a smarter baserunner, look for Clark to steal 50+ bases every year. Folks in Baltimore can't wait to see this kid under the bright lights and gaze of 40,000 screaming fans.
Pick 4
Matthew Hernandez
Matthew Hernandez was arguably the best position player in this year's draft. Unfortunately, he won't see any action with Rochester. With nearly all of their prospect money spent on Joaquin Paz and Juan Rivera in the international market, there wasn't the $3,720,000 left to ink Hernandez. Hernandez is shocked, as he was very anxious to get started with Rochester, but he plans to finish up college this year and see what other opportunities he can find after that.
Pick 3
|
Clay Brooks looks to continue his success with Las Vegas after being the 3rd overall pick. A prodigy out of high school, he mowed down hitters with an amazing fastball/slider combination. During his time at Northern Essex Community College he developed a curveball and change up, though those are still being worked on. He's got great control for a 20 year old, and handles even professional hitters with ease. It won't be long before we see Mr. Brooks announced as the opening day starter for the Las Vegas Outlaws.
Pick 2
|
Scott Hurst is regarded as the pitcher with the most potential in this year's draft, but he's got a long way to go. He's got the tools to be an elite starting pitcher for many years, and Detroit is hoping their investment in him pays off. At Nevada High School he set the school record for most innings pitched, most wins, most strikeouts, and most girls taken to prom. He's had some arm trouble, so he'll have to train hard to stay healthy, but if he can keep the 'Ace' bandages off his golden left arm, he'll keep the 'Ace' label next to his name for many years.
Pick 1
Curt Hogan
Curt Hogan. Curt. Hogan. How I love to say thy name! Alright, I got nothing on this guy. All I know is that he's got beady eyes and a strange goatee. But Anaheim must know enough about this high schooler to make him the top pick in the draft. It's unknown at this time whether Hogan is holding out, or if Anaheim has yet to send him an offer. But if anything's going to happen, it's going to have to happen in the next few days.
Saturday, July 16, 2011
Season 2 Draft - Picks 12-22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brainiac Max Bell from Tipton, IA, educated in New Jersey at the acclaimed Princeton University now finds his home on the island of Honolulu, Hawaii. Graduated with a pre-law degree after just 3 years, Bell was just as impressive on the pitcher's mound. He's got the stuff to crack the major league rosters of several teams right now, but he's got room to grow, and the Sharks are looking forward to seeing him blossom into what they think he can be. As the 12th overall pick, and $3,000,000 richer, Bell is ready to buckle down and make his alma mater proud.
Tuesday, July 12, 2011
The Ballpark Effect
Guest Post
Author - bjshumacher
I’m always looking for ways to analyze teams and their performances. I’m an engineer by trade, so I’m a numbers guy. I love playing with and analyzing statistics, looking for the next big edge. I also love sports. I guess that’s why I love baseball so much. THE best sport for statistics geeks like me.
Recently, I was curious to see which teams are performing the best so far this season - more than just looking at their current W-L records. But since each team plays their home games in different parks, this was difficult to do just by glancing at their Team OPS or ERA numbers. Playing in
The Ballparks
In order to come up with a somewhat normalized method of comparing home field performance, I first looked at the ballparks. As we know, each ballpark is rated for production in singles, doubles, triples, and home runs. Using this, I gave each park an overall rating in terms of total bases. In other words, each rating point for singles is worth 1 point, each rating point for doubles is worth 2 points, etc. I added all these together to get a total “O” Rating, or Offensive Rating. I then ranked the parks from 1 to 32 based on their O Rating. Finally, I flipped things around and ranked the parks from 1 to 32 in terms of pitcher friendliness, or “P” Rank. That is, the ballpark with the lowest O Rating is the highest ranked park for pitcher friendliness.
As you can see, with an O Rating of 53, WhatifSports Field in
The best park to pitch in, by far, is Mustain Stadium in
BALLPARKS | | | | | | |||
Ballpark | Franchise | Park O Rating | Park O Rank | Park P Rank |
| |||
WhatIfSports Field | SFE Rattlers | 53 | 1 | 32 |
| |||
Durham Bulls Athletic Park | DUR Outliers | 37 | 2 | 31 |
| |||
Isotopes | ALB Albatross | 28 | 3 | 30 |
| |||
Herschel Greer Stadium | NAS Sound | 18 | 4 | 29 |
| |||
Ameriquest Field in | | 16 | 5 | 28 |
| |||
Fenway | BOS Black Sox | 14 | 6 | 27 |
| |||
Humphrey Metrodome | MIN Miracles | 10 | 7 | 26 |
| |||
Volcanoes Stadium | SAL Eruption | 8 | 8 | 25 |
| |||
Miller | MIL High Life | 6 | 9 | 24 |
| |||
Turner Field | ATL Braves | 5 | 10 | 23 |
| |||
U.S. Cellular Field | CH2 Pale Hose | 2 | 11 | 22 |
| |||
Alliance Bank Stadium | SYR Siege | 0 | 12 | 20 |
| |||
The Diamond | RIC Pine Riders | 0 | 12 | 17 |
| |||
Nat Bailey Stadium | VC Wolf Eels | 0 | 12 | 19 |
| |||
Frontier Field | ROC Red Wings | 0 | 12 | 18 |
| |||
Waterfront | TRE Thunder | 0 | 12 | 21 |
| |||
Kauffman Stadium | KC Monarchs | -2 | 17 | 15 |
| |||
Tropicana Field | TB Acers | -2 | 17 | 16 |
| |||
Oriole | BAL YardBirds | -3 | 19 | 14 |
| |||
Yankee Stadium (II) | NY1 Yankees | -5 | 20 | 13 |
| |||
McCoy Stadium | PAW Fire Cats | -8 | 21 | 11 |
| |||
Conte Yard | CHY Cattle Prod | -8 | 21 | 12 |
| |||
Comerica | DET Bombers | -9 | 23 | 10 |
| |||
Fifth Third Field | TOL Mud Hens | -10 | 24 | 8 |
| |||
Angel Stadium | LAA Tiger Blood | -10 | 24 | 9 |
| |||
Cashman Field | | -12 | 26 | 7 |
| |||
Aloha Stadium | HON Sharks | -13 | 27 | 6 |
| |||
Busch Stadium (II) | STL Cardinals | -17 | 28 | 5 |
| |||
Rosenblatt Stadium | OMA Oracles | -24 | 29 | 4 |
| |||
Safeco Field | SEA Penguins | -26 | 30 | 3 |
| |||
Lawrence-Dumont Stadium | WIC Learjets | -29 | 31 | 2 |
| |||
Mustain Stadium | BUR Northern | -51 | 32 | 1 |
| |||
Home Offense
Now that I’ve compared the ballparks, I can now compare the teams’ offensive production on a more level playing field. I looked at each team’s OPS, and ranked them from 1 to 32. I then compared the teams’ OPS Rank to the ballpark O Rank, and took the difference of the two. For example, for
Using this simplified method of comparing offenses, the St Louis Cardinals, New York Yankees, and Wichita Learjets have the most potent offensive teams, whereas
OFFENSIVE POWER | | | |
Franchise | Ballpark O Rank | Team OPS Rank | Team Offense Power |
STL Cardinals | 28 | 10 | 18 |
NY1 Yankees | 20 | 5 | 15 |
WIC Learjets | 31 | 16 | 15 |
PAW Fire Cats | 21 | 10 | 11 |
OMA Oracles | 29 | 19 | 10 |
HON Sharks | 27 | 20 | 7 |
KC Monarchs | 17 | 12 | 5 |
RIC Pine Riders | 12 | 7 | 5 |
| 5 | 1 | 4 |
BUR Northern | 32 | 28 | 4 |
SYR Siege | 12 | 9 | 3 |
LAA Tiger Blood | 24 | 21 | 3 |
SEA Penguins | 30 | 27 | 3 |
MIL High Life | 9 | 8 | 1 |
DUR Outliers | 2 | 2 | 0 |
ALB Albatross | 3 | 3 | 0 |
BOS Black Sox | 6 | 6 | 0 |
TOL Mud Hens | 24 | 26 | -2 |
ROC Red Wings | 12 | 15 | -3 |
SFE Rattlers | 1 | 4 | -3 |
SAL Eruption | 8 | 13 | -5 |
BAL YardBirds | 19 | 24 | -5 |
TB Acers | 17 | 23 | -6 |
| 26 | 32 | -6 |
CH2 Pale Hose | 11 | 18 | -7 |
MIN Miracles | 7 | 14 | -7 |
DET Bombers | 23 | 30 | -7 |
CHY Cattle Prod | 21 | 29 | -8 |
VC Wolf Eels | 12 | 22 | -10 |
NAS Sound | 4 | 16 | -12 |
TRE Thunder | 12 | 25 | -13 |
ATL Braves | 10 | 31 | -21 |
Home Pitching
Now let’s look at the pitchers. Using the same method as I did for offense, I compared the ballparks’ P Rank to the home team’s pitching performance, using team ERA as the comparing statistic. Again, I took the difference between the Ballpark P Rank and the Team ERA Rank to get a Team Pitching Power rating. The Durham Outliers, playing in the second toughest ballpark to pitch in, have the league’s third-best Team ERA. This gives them an impressive Team Pitching Power rating of 28.
And
PITCHING POWER | | | |
Franchise | Ballpark P Rank | Team ERA Rank | Team Pitching Power |
DUR Outliers | 31 | 3 | 28 |
SAL Eruption | 25 | 4 | 21 |
VC Wolf Eels | 19 | 1 | 18 |
SYR Siege | 20 | 5 | 15 |
ATL Braves | 23 | 8 | 15 |
KC Monarchs | 15 | 2 | 13 |
RIC Pine Riders | 17 | 10 | 7 |
TRE Thunder | 21 | 14 | 7 |
CHY Cattle Prod | 12 | 6 | 6 |
NAS Sound | 29 | 23 | 6 |
| 28 | 24 | 4 |
CH2 Pale Hose | 22 | 18 | 4 |
ROC Red Wings | 18 | 17 | 1 |
TB Acers | 16 | 15 | 1 |
NY1 Yankees | 13 | 13 | 0 |
ALB Albatross | 30 | 30 | 0 |
SFE Rattlers | 32 | 32 | 0 |
TOL Mud Hens | 8 | 10 | -2 |
MIN Miracles | 26 | 28 | -2 |
MIL High Life | 24 | 27 | -3 |
BOS Black Sox | 27 | 31 | -4 |
| 7 | 12 | -5 |
BUR Northern | 1 | 7 | -6 |
WIC Learjets | 2 | 9 | -7 |
PAW Fire Cats | 11 | 19 | -8 |
LAA Tiger Blood | 9 | 20 | -11 |
OMA Oracles | 4 | 16 | -12 |
HON Sharks | 6 | 21 | -15 |
BAL YardBirds | 14 | 29 | -15 |
DET Bombers | 10 | 26 | -16 |
SEA Penguins | 3 | 21 | -18 |
STL Cardinals | 5 | 25 | -20 |
Overall Power Ratings
So as a final comparison in all of this number-crunching, I added the Team Offense Power and the Team Pitching Power to get the overall Team Power Ratings.
Who is the most ‘normal’ team in the league? Yes, it’s
OVERALL TEAM POWER | | | |
Franchise | Team Offense Power | Team Pitching Power | Overall Team Power |
DUR Outliers | 0 | 28 | 28 |
SYR Siege | 3 | 15 | 18 |
KC Monarchs | 5 | 13 | 18 |
SAL Eruption | -5 | 21 | 16 |
NY1 Yankees | 15 | 0 | 15 |
RIC Pine Riders | 5 | 7 | 12 |
| 4 | 4 | 8 |
VC Wolf Eels | -10 | 18 | 8 |
WIC Learjets | 15 | -7 | 8 |
PAW Fire Cats | 11 | -8 | 3 |
ALB Albatross | 0 | 0 | 0 |
BUR Northern | 4 | -6 | -2 |
STL Cardinals | 18 | -20 | -2 |
CHY Cattle Prod | -8 | 6 | -2 |
ROC Red Wings | -3 | 1 | -2 |
MIL High Life | 1 | -3 | -2 |
OMA Oracles | 10 | -12 | -2 |
CH2 Pale Hose | -7 | 4 | -3 |
SFE Rattlers | -3 | 0 | -3 |
TOL Mud Hens | -2 | -2 | -4 |
BOS Black Sox | 0 | -4 | -4 |
TB Acers | -6 | 1 | -5 |
TRE Thunder | -13 | 7 | -6 |
NAS Sound | -12 | 6 | -6 |
ATL Braves | -21 | 15 | -6 |
HON Sharks | 7 | -15 | -8 |
LAA Tiger Blood | 3 | -11 | -8 |
MIN Miracles | -7 | -2 | -9 |
| -6 | -5 | -11 |
SEA Penguins | 3 | -18 | -15 |
BAL YardBirds | -5 | -15 | -20 |
DET Bombers | -7 | -16 | -23 |
Summary
So how does all of this compare to the teams’ current winning percentages? Durham, who has the best Overall Team Power rating, also had the best winning percentage in the majors up to this point (83 games played), cruising along at a .675 winning percentage.
How can we use all of this information? Heck, I don’t know, but it was fun to do. Like I said, I’m a numbers guy. I guess owners can look at these results to help determine where they need more help in the future, or just bask in the glow of having the best power rating in the league.
bjschumacher